Producers voice dissent over U.S. Supreme Court animal cruelty content ruling

For the San Francisco Chronicle, producers Chris Palmer and Peter Kimball voice their opinion on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling which strikes down a federal law that outlawed the distribution of videos depicting graphic animal cruelty.

April 28, 2010

For the San Francisco Chronicle, producers Chris Palmer and Peter Kimball voice their opinion on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling which strikes down a federal law that outlawed the distribution of videos depicting graphic animal cruelty.

Top Stories

Documentary

R.J. Cutler, Netflix prep “Big Vape” docuseries

By Barry Walsh

June 18, 2021

People/Biz

BANFF ’21: CBC commits to 30% diverse key creatives in its programming

By Playback Daily

June 18, 2021

Documentary

Jessica Kingdon’s “Ascension” highlights 2021 Tribeca jury award winners

By Andrew Jeffrey

June 18, 2021

People/Biz

Banijay exits MIPCOM physical market for 2021, plans virtual presence

By Jillian Morgan

June 18, 2021

About The Author

Barry Walsh is editor and content director for realscreen, and has served as editor of the publication since 2009. With a career in entertainment media that spans two decades, prior to realscreen, he held the associate editor post for now defunct sister publication Boards, which focused on the advertising and commercial production industries. Before Boards, he served as editor of Canadian Music Network, a weekly music industry trade, and as music editor for HMV.com. As content director, he also oversees the development of content for the brand's market-leading events, the Realscreen Summit and Realscreen West, as well as new content initiatives.

// Author Page